Tamron makes a 70-200 f2.8, model number a001. It goes for about $770 new. You can pick it up for around $570 or so used on KEH. The lens is pretty good optically but it's not a really high performer when it comes to autofocus speed. I always had pretty good luck with it taking sports pics with it as long is the action kept then lens closer toHere is the Sigma 70-200 Sports lens alongside its 70-200mm f/2.8 contemporaries: Positioned above from left to right are the following lenses: Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS Lens Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E AF-S FL VR Lens Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sports Lens
Recommendations Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL (metal 77mm filter thread, 50.3 oz./1,425g with tripod collar, 3.6'/1.1m close-focus, $1,897 new or about $1,500 used if you know How to Win at eBay .) bigger. I got mine at Adorama; I'd also get it at Amazon, at B&H, at Crutchfield or used at eBay.
The Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR is an FX-format telephoto zoom lens with a versatile 70-200mm focal range and constant f/2.8 aperture. Weighing in at just over 1,400 grams, the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR features an inner focusing mechanism with autofocus controlled by a Silent Wave Motor (SWM). If you’re considering a long lens for the Z system, I’m sure that the Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S and Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S have caught your eye. These are two of the best lenses Nikon has ever made, and (taking teleconverters into account) both are capable of reaching 400mm at an aperture of f/5.6. 5Rk7S.